Conocimiento Ecológico Tradicional (CET) y derecho a la comunicación: comunicando la justicia climática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.16921/chasqui.v1i155.4985Palabras clave:
cambio climático, justicia climática, derecho a la comunicación, conocimientos tradicionales, adaptaciónResumen
Las comunidades locales, indígenas y tradicionales poseen una serie de conocimientos sobre su territorio que puede ser fundamental para la adaptación a los efectos del cambio climático. Sin embargo, este conocimiento, conocido en círculos académicos como “conocimientos ecológicos tradicionales” (CET), es usualmente ignorado en las políticas públicas que buscan responder al cambio climático y la degradación ambiental. Esta situación es, no es solo el resultado de la brecha epistemológica entre el conocimiento totalizador occidental y los conocimientos de las comunidades de base, sino también de los déficits estructurales en el ámbito de la comunicación y la información que afligen a muchas comunidades vulneradas.Referencias
Andrade Mendoza, Karen and Plaza Vanegas, Galo. Conserving the Mangroves? Social and Environmental Conflict in the Gulf of Guayaquil. In Pedro-Carañana, J., Herrera-Huérfano, E., & Almanza, J. O. (Eds.). (2022). Communicative Justice in the Pluriverse: An International Dialogue. Taylor & Francis.
Barker, Joanne. Territory as Analytic: The Dispossession of Lenapehoking and the Subprime Crisis. In Social Text 135 Vol. 36 no. 2, June 2018.
Bayrak, Mucahid Mustafa, and Lawal Mohammed Marafa. “Are Vietnamese farmers able to combat global climate change? A case study on perceptions and attitudes towards sustainable forest management and REDD+ in Central Vietnam.” Journal of Sustainable Forestry, vol. 39, no. 3, 2020, pp. 242-258.
Bwambale, Bosco, et al. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Flood Risk Management : a Preliminary Case Study of the Rwenzori.” Jamba, vol. 10, no. 1, 2018.
Dowsley, Martha. “Community Clusters in Wildlife and Environmental Management: Using TEK and Community Involvement to Improve Co-Management in an Era of Rapid Environmental Change.” Polar Research, vol. 28, no. 1, 2009, pp. 43–59.
CRIS Campaign. Assessing Communication Rights: A Handbook. Communication Rights in the Information Society Campaign. 2005.
de Echeverria, Wyllie Victoria Rawn, and Thomas F. Thornton. “Using Traditional Ecological Knowledge to Understand and Adapt to Climate and Biodiversity Change on the Pacific Coast of North America.” Ambio, vol. 48, no. 12, 2019, pp. 1447-1469
Escobar, Arturo. Mundos y conocimientos de otro modo. Tabula Rasa, Nº 1, 2003
Fabricant, Nicole. “Good Living for Whom? Bolivia’s Climate Justice Movement and the Limitations of Indigenous Cosmovisions.” Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, 2013, pp. 159–78. Crossref, doi:10.1080/17442222.2013.805618.
Garvey, James. The Ethics of Climate Change: Right and Wrong in a Warming World (Think Now). 1st ed., Continuum, 2008.
Gilio-Whitaker, Dina. As Long as Grass Grows: The Indigenous Fight for Environmental Justice, from Colonization to Standing Rock. Reprint, Beacon Press, 2020.
Hatfield, Samantha Chisholm, et al. “Indian time: time, seasonality, and culture in Traditional Ecological Knowledge of climate change.” Ecological Processes, vol. 7, no. 1, 2018
Hosen, Nadzirah, Hitoshi Nakamura, and Amran Hamzah. “Adaptation to Climate Change: Does Traditional Ecological Knowledge Hold the Key?” Sustainability 12.2 (2020): 676. Crossref. Web.
Humphreys, Stephen. Human Rights and Climate Change. 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Ingty, Tenzing. “High mountain communities and climate change: adaptation, traditional ecological knowledge, and institutions.” Climatic Change, vol. 145, no. 1, 2017, pp.41-55.
Institute for Economics and Peace. Ecological Threat Register 2020. 10 Sep 2020
IPCC. AR4 Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J. B. R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, 2021.
IPCC. AR6 Synthesis Report : Climate Change 2023. IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/
Jarandilla Nuñez, Alan. “Mother Earth and climate justice, Indigenous peoples’ perspectives of an alternative development paradigm”.In Jafry, Tahseen (Ed). Routledge Handbook of Climate Justice (Routledge International Handbooks). 1st ed., Routledge, 2020.
Klein, Naomi. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate. Toronto, Vintage Canada, 2015.
Lee, Philip and Vargas, Lorenzo, Eds. Expanding Shrinking Communication Spaces. Centre for Communication Rights & Southbound Publications, Penang, Indonesia, 2020.
Ludwig, David, and Phil Macnaghten. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Innovation Governance: a Framework for Responsible and Just Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation, vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, pp. 26–44
Mazzocchi, Fulvio. “Western science and traditional knowledge. Despite their variations, different forms of knowledge can learn from each other.” EMBO reports vol. 7,5 (2006): 463-6.
Prober, Suzanne M., et al. “Australian Aboriginal Peoples’ Seasonal Knowledge: a Potential Basis for Shared Understanding in Environmental Management.” Ecology and Society, vol. 16, no. 2, 2011, pp. 12-29
Robinson, Mary. Climate Justice: Hope, Resilience, and the Fight for a Sustainable Future. Illustrated, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019.
Roosvall, Anna, and Matthew Tegelberg. Media and Transnational Climate Justice. Bern, Switzerland, Peter Lang, 2018.
Schlosberg, David. “Climate Justice and Capabilities: A Framework for Adaptation Policy.” Ethics & International Affairs, vol. 26, no. 4, 2012, pp. 445–61.
Segato, Rita Laura. “Aníbal Quijano y la perspectiva de la colonialidad del poder”. en La crítica de la colonialidad en ocho ensayos. Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros. 2013.
de Sousa Santos, Boaventura. The End of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South. Durham: Duke University Press. 2018.
Taremwa, Nathan Kanuma, Marie-Christine Gasingirwa, and Donat Nsabimana. “Unleashing traditional ecological knowledge for biodiversity conservation and resilience to climate change in Rwanda.” African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 2021, pp. 1-12.
Tokar, Brian. “On the Evolution and Continuing Development of the Climate Justice Movement” In Jafry, Tahseen (Ed). Routledge Handbook of Climate Justice (Routledge International Handbooks). 1st ed., Routledge, 2020.
Sze, Julie. Environmental Justice in a Moment of Danger. Amsterdam, Netherlands, Amsterdam University Press, 2020.
Wallace-Wells, David. The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming. Reprint, Tim Duggan Books, 2020.
Vargas, Lorenzo and Lee, Philip. Addressing Communication and Information Poverty in the Context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS). Journal of Latin American Communication Research 6 (1-2). 2018.
World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future (Oxford Paperbacks). 1st ed., Oxford University Press, 1987.
Washington, Harriet. A Terrible Thing to Waste: Environmental Racism and Its Assault on the American Mind. Illustrated, Little, Brown Spark, 2020.
Yager, Karina, et al. “Socio-Ecological Dimensions of Andean Pastoral Landscape Change: Bridging Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Satellite Image Analysis in Sajama National Park, Bolivia.” Regional Environmental Change, vol. 19, no. 5, 2019, pp.1353–1369.
Zimring, Carl. Clean and White: A History of Environmental Racism in the United States. Reprint, NYU Press, 2017.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
- Los autores/as conservarán plenos derechos de autor sobre su obra y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada de Creative Commons (CC BY-ND), que permite a terceros la redistribución, comercial y no comercial, siempre y cuando la obra no se modifique y se transmita en su totalidad, reconociendo su autoría.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet.
